Update chapter1.qmd

Add Dr. C updates
This commit is contained in:
Kyle Belanger 2023-01-18 07:59:32 -05:00
parent 648b5d6563
commit 176565c1a4

View file

@ -12,33 +12,36 @@ hospitals had clinical laboratories by 1923 [@berger1999]. Before 1960,
almost all testing in the laboratory was performed using manual methods.
In the mid-1960s, a limited amount of automated analyzers became
available, allowing for more rapid testing and running multiple tests at
the same time [@park2017]. Since these early days of automation in the
last fifty years, the clinical laboratory has rapidly expanded
automation techniques. These include pre-packaged ready-to-use reagents,
automated dispensing, incubation and measurement, automated sample
processing (e.g., total laboratory automation systems, one- and
two-dimensional bar codes, radio frequency identification tags),
multiplexing tests from a single sample (e.g., microarrays), automated
data processing (e.g., reference range, alert value comparisons, quality
control assessment), automated interpretation (e.g., auto-verification),
image analysis (e.g., automated peripheral blood smear morphology -
CellaVision, whole slide scanning in surgical pathology), and mobile or
static robots to operate analyzers [@park2017]. This rise in automation
in the clinical laboratory has also led to the need for more advanced
computer systems to go along with the advances in instrument technology.
Over the past few decades, LISs have evolved from relatively narrow,
often arcane, or home-grown systems into sophisticated systems that are
more user-friendly and support a broader range of functions and
integration with other technologies that laboratories deploy
[@henricks2015]. Modern LISs consist of complex, interrelated computer
programs and infrastructure that support laboratories' vast array of
information-processing needs. LISs have functions in all phases of
patient testing, including specimen and test order intake, specimen
processing and tracking, support of analysis and interpretation, and
report creation and distribution. In addition, LISs provide management
reports and other data that laboratories need to run their operations
and to support continuous improvement and quality initiatives
[@henricks2015].
the same time [@park2017].
Since these early days of automation in the last fifty years, the
clinical laboratory has rapidly expanded automation techniques. These
include pre-packaged ready-to-use reagents, automated dispensing,
incubation and measurement, automated sample processing (e.g., total
laboratory automation systems, one- and two-dimensional bar codes, radio
frequency identification tags), multiplexing tests from a single sample
(e.g., microarrays), automated data processing (e.g., reference range,
alert value comparisons, quality control assessment), automated
interpretation (e.g., auto-verification), image analysis (e.g.,
automated peripheral blood smear morphology - CellaVision, whole slide
scanning in surgical pathology), and mobile or static robots to operate
analyzers [@park2017]. This rise in automation in the clinical
laboratory has also led to the need for more advanced computer systems
to go along with the advances in instrument technology.
Over the past few decades, Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) have
evolved from relatively narrow, often arcane, or home-grown systems into
sophisticated systems that are more user-friendly and support a broader
range of functions and integration with other technologies that
laboratories deploy [@henricks2015]. Modern LISs consist of complex,
interrelated computer programs and infrastructure that support
laboratories' vast array of information-processing needs. LISs have
functions in all phases of patient testing, including specimen and test
order intake, specimen processing and tracking, support of analysis and
interpretation, and report creation and distribution. In addition, LISs
provide management reports and other data that laboratories need to run
their operations and to support continuous improvement and quality
initiatives [@henricks2015].
The clinical laboratory's primary business purpose is to provide testing
results requested by physicians and other healthcare professionals. In a
@ -55,21 +58,22 @@ algorithms; this is defined as 'reflective testing' [@srivastava2010].
Both reflex and reflective testing became possible with the advent of
laboratory information systems (LIS) that were sufficiently flexible to
permit modification of existing test requests at various stages of the
analytical process [@srivastava2010]. This research study will focus
specifically on reflex testing, those tests added automatically by a set
of rules established in each laboratory. In most current clinical
laboratories, reflex testing is performed with a 'hard' cutoff, using a
specifically established range with no means of flexibility
[@murphy2021]. This study will examine the use of Machine learning to
develop algorithms to allow flexibility for automatic reflex testing in
clinical chemistry. The goal is to fill the gap between hard-coded
reflex testing and fully manual reflective testing using machine
learning algorithms.
analytical process [@srivastava2010].
This research study will focus specifically on reflex testing, those
tests added automatically by a set of rules established in each
laboratory. In most current clinical laboratories, reflex testing is
performed with a 'hard' cutoff, using a specifically established range
with no means of flexibility [@murphy2021]. This study will examine the
use of Machine learning to develop algorithms to allow flexibility for
automatic reflex testing in clinical chemistry. The goal is to fill the
gap between hard-coded reflex testing and fully manual reflective
testing using machine learning algorithms.
## Purpose and Research Statement
Develop and test a machine learning algorithm to establish if said
algorithm can perform better then current hard coded rules to reduced
algorithm can perform better than current hard-coded rules to reduce
unnecessary patient testing.
## Significance